Archive for the ‘Photography’ Category

h1

Stock photography

May 3, 2010

If you’re ever designing a website, brochure, display, sell sheet, or anything with generic photography, you’re better off buying stock photography than hiring someone to take photos for you.

While Getty has bought up most of the stock out there, there’s still some good sites for cheap (and good) stock photography.

One that I use often is iStockPhoto, where you pay a certain amount, and then your money gets converted into credits. Each photo is n credits, and the bigger the size, the more credits it costs.

Check them out the next time you need generic photography. You won’t be disappointed, I don’t think.

h1

Why using Flash is bad for your portfolio

April 24, 2010

If you go looking for a photographer for a wedding, senior photos, well, whatever really, you’ve probably come across a lot of sites that use flash for the portfolios. Most likely, you go to the site, and you sit there waiting on a loader animation for at least 5-10 seconds, or at worst a minute or two. Then you get to see the photos, but what happens if you want to send someone a link to a particular photo on the site? It’s usually not possible. You’ve just been to a portfolio made in flash.

First, a bit of statistics.

Studies have shown people will, on average, wait on a site to load for 8.5 seconds. Which means, after about 8 seconds, if your potential client hasn’t seen any images, they will leave. Poof. Gone. You’ve lost what could be a big chunk o’ money due to a slow loading site.

Second, usability.

People have become used to normal websites- where the address bar, back & forward buttons work. It’s been that way since the web began, and flash sites generally screw that up completely. People WANT to send their friends/coworkers/family links to things (and chain letters, but that’s another rant). Unless the flash site is extremely well created (and let’s face it, the majority aren’t) that simply isn’t possible.

One study that I found very interesting was done by dack.com. It found that on Tiffany’s website (in 2000, but still extremely relevant), where they had a normal HTML shopping site and a flash version, that participants could find out simple things, such as how much an item was, comparing multiple items, etc 40% faster on the normal HTML site than the flash version. One of the major things that tripped people up? The normal back button didn’t work. And as far as I know (and I make websites for a living, but I could be wrong…) it’s simply not possible to make that work with flash.

Third, Apple.

There’s 50 million iPhones out there. Surely one hell of a lot of iPod Touches, and they’re on target to do well over 1 million iPads by the end of the year. None of which have flash. People are using iPhones and such a lot more than they used to, and that’s only going to go up. Don’t expect flash to come to iPhones/iPads/iPod Touches any time soon, since Apple and Adobe are basically in a holy-war still.

Why should you care? Well, iPhones account for about 25% of the smartphone market. That’s a LOT of people to exclude.

Finally…

Why should you use a technology that forcefully excludes a huge portion of your potential clients and will annoy the rest of them? It’s just bad business sense.

Regular sites simply work faster, better, and in the end really have the upper hand on any flash site. Especially with really cool stuff coming out of JavaScript development at the moment, flash is really, truly, (hopefully) dying a nice, slow, painful death.

Of course, I’m guilty of it too. However, the only reason for that is I simply haven’t had time to fix my site.

h1

How to add your photos on Flickr to a group

March 24, 2010

Flickr is a great photo sharing tool. With millions of photographs, and TONS of users, it’s a great place not only to share photographs with your friends and family, but also a wonderful place to get noticed. Countless photographers of amazing talent have been discovered via flickr, but that will only happen to you if you get your photos out there.

One of the ways to get your photos noticed is to post them to groups. You also need to spend some quality time finding other photographers that you like and comment… Always comment back when someone comments on your stream, because the more relationships you build, the more people will friend you, and the more likely you will get noticed by someone important.

So, how do you add your photos to groups? It’s pretty simple. First, click the group tab at the top of the flickr website.

Then click “Search for a group”. Type in some keywords, for this photograph I might type in “Indiana”, or “church”, or “statue”, or “nature”.

There’s tons of groups for all different things. Maybe you want to become active in a group of people your own age (“College” would be a good search term)? Or possibly of your interests (“Rock Music Lovers”)? You could also join one of the groups that is specifically set up to provide constructive criticism. In these groups, you post a photo, but must also comment and give constructive criticism on a certain number of other photos.

Join a group, and then go back to your photo page and click “Add to group”. Select the group you want to add the photograph to, and then boom, you’re done!

h1

When taking a photograph, part two: Lighting,

February 8, 2010

there’s a few things to consider. We’ll look at a couple of photographs and compare them in these categories.

  • Subject
  • Lighting
  • Background
  • Foreground
  • Color (or lack thereof)
  • Focus
  • The way the eye moves

Click on the following images for larger versions:

This photograph is of my family on Mother’s Day.

This is a photograph of a flower through a shoebox

These images have dramatically different subjects, and dramatically different shooting styles. The first one is a family portrait, and the second is a landscape, shot through a shoebox. However, while the styles are different, you must consider the same things when shooting them.

Lighting

Lighting usually is just thought about as the artificial light in the room or the natural light outside. However, in every situation one must think about all different kinds of light, and what one wants the final product to look like. For example, the color of light, while usually unnoticeable to the human eye unless you look for it, is important. Fluorescent bulbs burn at a different color than incandescent, and that’s different from natural sunlight, which is different from those ‘cool white’ bulbs, which is different from colored bulbs, which are different from halogen bulbs, which are different from… well, you get the idea. Basically, everything is slightly different. You can notice this if you take a piece of white paper, or a bowl of Kraft Macaroni & Cheese from a incandescent light to a fluorescent and then outside. The color of the white paper or the yellow mac & cheese will be slightly different. (Oh, and you don’t even want to know how difficult it is to get color right when you’re shooting in a room with a bunch of different types of bulbs and natural light.)… But I’m getting slightly off topic here…

Beyond the different types of light, you need to think about how you can use light (or lack of light) to your advantage. Some of my favorite photos aren’t very bright- it’s the darkness of them that gives an intimate feel. Sometimes it’s the lack of light that makes something better. It’s the wondering about what is just to the left or right, what is that that is just slightly too dark to make out, that makes people come back for more of your photographs.

#1) This has a lot of things going on. It has a vignette, the blacks were boosted, it was converted from color to black and white, exposure has been changed, brightness and contrast have been changed, and the color temperature has been adjusted. Some of this we’ll discuss in Color (or lack thereof) later on, namely color temperature and the black and white conversion.

So, this was shot under incandescent bulbs. But really, for this, that doesn’t particularly matter. We’re converting it to black and white, and so what we really want to do is to just get it to look right. The vignette and increasing the blacks in the image (such as, making the blacks blacker, thus some greys went to black) helps to bring focus to the center of the image, and since the blacks were increased, helps to bring focus to the brighter areas of the image. Adjusting the exposure, brightness and contrast helped to do even more of this, making the whole image brighter (exposure & brightness), increased the definition of the whites and the blacks, and reduced the amount of dull greys (contrast).

#2) In this image, the exposure, blacks and tone curve were adjusted.

What is the tone curve?
Well, check out the screenshot to the right–>. Basically, it allows you to change the brightness of the different tones (Highlights, Lights, Darks, and Shadows). By increasing the brightness of the highlights, you automatically change the brightness of everything else (hence the curve aspect). You can think of it as a rubber band stretched between two fingers.. If you push out on the rubber band with another finger, the whole thing changes, not just the spot you’ve pushed out on. Another thing to notice in this screenshot is the light mountain behind the curve: that’s what tones are most predominate in the image. So, in this image, I don’t have very many highlights, which is why I increased them to bring them out as much as possible, and I have a lot of shadows and darks, which is why I slightly decreased them to give more oomph to the lights and highlights. The tone curve allows you to fine tune the brightness of the image. Usually it’s said that you’re looking for a nice S shape in the tone curve.

Here’s the steps to the process.. This goes left to right, top to bottom. Click the images for larger versions.



  • The first one is straight out of camera. Notice how the magnifying glass puts the image onto the tracing paper- looks really cool just like this I think…
  • The second one, I’ve cropped the top and bottom of the box out, applied a Lightroom preset that I have.
  • The third, I’ve cropped it a bit tighter and adjusted the exposure up a bit.
  • The fourth, the black level has been bumped up  to 5.
  • The fifth, I start playing with tones. First, shadow tones get a boost.
  • The sixth, Highlight tones get a boost…
  • Finally, Light tones. And it’s the final image.

I hope the preceeding images have given you a sense of the power of a good photo editing program. The changes–when looked at step by step– are subtle.. But comparing the first image with the final one, it’s a huge difference.

Next time, Background.

h1

When taking a photograph, part one,

February 8, 2010

there’s a few things to consider. We’ll look at a couple of photographs and compare them in these categories.

  • Subject
  • Lighting
  • Background
  • Foreground
  • Color (or lack thereof)
  • Focus
  • The way the eye moves

Click on the following images for larger versions:

This photograph is of my family on Mother’s Day.

This is a photograph of a flower through a shoebox

These images have dramatically different subjects, and dramatically different shooting styles. The first one is a family portrait, and the second is a landscape, shot through a shoebox. However, while the styles are different, you must consider the same things when shooting them.

Subject

#1) Obviously this is of people. However, who exactly is the subject? While, yes, you can have multiple people be the subject of a photograph, in this case there is only one real subject, and the others are less important. In this case, the true subject is my Grandmother. Everyone else is looking away from the camera, doing their own thing– in motion, you might say (and I do). Everyone else is simply providing lines in the image. You’ll notice pretty much everyone is looking at grandma, or in her general vicinity. Keeping your photographs interesting is very important: and this one most definitely does that. You’re probably wondering, as I am now (since this photo is a few years old and I don’t remember the context) what everyone is doing, and what they’re thinking about. If you look closely you’ll see what seems to be a cup in front on grandma, and so you’ll guess that maybe they’ve just finished a meal. Or maybe they’re looking at each other and are mad because no one will cop to eating the last piece of pie. Or dropping the mashed potatoes all over the floor. Whatever you’re thinking, that’s the magic of photography. Photography was created for this kind of a shot: movement. Never before could you accurately capture people in action, everything was from memory or completely staged to look like it was action. While some painters got really good at it, it was photography that did it perfectly.

#2) This one is, clearly, of a flower. While this isn’t the best thing I’ve ever done, I still like it. I recommend clicking on it to see a larger version. This was shot using a shoebox.

I’m not sure, but I think the amazingly talented (and French) Remi invented this. See some of his brilliant videos on vimeo here… Sadly, it looks like he hasn’t been posting for awhile. Basically, you take a magnifying glass, some tracing paper, and a shoebox and put them together. Result: Really cool pictures and videos with a small area for your subject. Using one of these basically automatically gives you a vignette (dark fading border around the edges), which pulls the viewer’s eye toward the center.

Check out the next post for Lighting (and more talk of vignettes).

h1

Hello & Welcome.

January 24, 2010

So, I’ve decided to write about photography for English Comp II. There will be a smattering of posts on:

  • History
  • Terminology
  • Techniques
  • Using Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom
  • And how amazing Baked Ruffles Sour Cream & Onion and Jones Soda is.

One thing you may notice is I probably won’t ever mention Nikon cameras. It’s not that I dislike them, but I started on Canons, and have never really used a Nikon.

The Beginning…

There are several types of cameras, and I shall list a couple of the most-used now.

  • P&S (Point and Shoot): The type of camera you probably own. Things like a Canon Digital Elph. A cell phone camera can be classified as a P&S. Generally these don’t have many settings, and are rather cheap.
  • SLR (Single Lens Reflex): SLR cameras are larger, and have many more settings and options, such as aperture, shutter speed, ISO, white balance, AF (autofocus) mode, file format, and AF location. SLRs are used by most professional photographers (cameras like the Canon 1Ds Mark III or 5d). SLRs are being used by many consumers too, people who are looking for better image quality, less shutter lag, and more options. (Canon Rebel XSi).

There is a lot of  photo editing software out there, but the applications I will be using are Adobe Photoshop and Adobe Lightroom. There’s Apple Aperture, iPhoto, Google’s Picasa, and may others too.

My Gear

I shoot with two cameras: a Canon Digital Rebel XT, and a Leica D-Lux 3 (click to see the new D-Lux 4).
For the Canon, I have a few lenses, four of which I love: the Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM, the cheap as chips (but still amazingly sharp) Canon EF 50mm f/1.8, and the Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM. I carry (but don’t use often) a Canon 580ex Flash as well.

Myself

I’ve done some professional photography work for some companies, having my work published in some newspapers, many ads, websites and promotional materials. I also keep an online portfolio (which hasn’t been updated in ages) here. I also post my photographs on Flickr. I’ve been featured in Schmaps’ East Coast Guide, too.

I don’t think I’m a great photographer, and at this point I’m kinda rusty as I haven’t had time to do any photo work in about a year, but I know my stuff, and generally everyone says I’m great. So I think I’m fairly good. I’m particularly happy with my Portrait of a Park series (which is ongoing), and my a form of minimalism series is shaping up quite well too.

I love so many photographs & photographers. To even try to come up with a list would take years. So, for a sampling of the most amazing photographs I have ever seen, check out my Flickr favorites. You won’t be disappointed.

Enough about me..

What about you? What photography do you enjoy? What do you shoot with? Do you think you’re any good? Do you have a Flickr account, or an account on a similar photo sharing website? Let us see it!